Why does a Gnip PowerTrack Twitter estimate with a shorter time duration have more tweets and cost more than for a longer duration?



Unfortunately, the Sifter service and website has been decommissioned as of September 30, 2018. Thanks to our 6,970 users who created 16,128 free estimates from the complete, undeleted history of Twitter between 1/14/2014 and 9/29/2018.

Please contact Twitter for approval of future academic or commercial use cases. If you can get an approved use case from Twitter, we can still help you work with the data inside DiscoverText.

@DiscoverText remains open and is still the top-ranked text analysis platform on the Internet.

All paid jobs prior to the decommissioning will still be honored.


I submitted two Gnip PowerTrack Twitter estimates that confuse me. I have shorter time window on one, but the shorter window led to a higher count and cost. The search criteria is identical for both estimates. For example:

Estimate #1 - shorter duration, more tweets

Start Date: 08/11/2014
End Date: 08/12/2014
Estimated Activities: 407,000

Estimate #2 - longer duration, fewer tweets

Start Date: 08/11/2014
End Date: 02/11/2015
Estimated Activities: 173,000

Could you explain why this is?


This is a by-product of the particular methods used by Twitter for generating estimates. If the main activities for a day fall outside of the estimate window, then they will not be fully reflected in the estimate.

We advise taking a variety of estimates with different date range combinations as a work around. This usually solves the problem.


Have more questions? Submit a request


Powered by Zendesk